SCHMC

Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) device using a core biopsy needle was developed to improve diagnostic accuracy by simultaneously obtaining cytological aspirates and histological core samples. We prospectively compared the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB with standard EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in patients with solid pancreatic masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and May 2013, consecutive patients with solid pancreatic masses were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo EUS-FNB using a core biopsy needle or EUS-FNA using a standard aspiration needle at a single tertiary center. The specimen was analyzed by onsite cytology, Papanicolaou-stain cytology, and histology. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy for malignancy. The secondary outcome measures were: the median number of passes required to establish a diagnosis, the proportion of patients in whom the diagnosis was established with each pass, and complication rates. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of combining onsite cytology with Papanicolaou-stain cytology and histology was not significantly different for the FNB (n = 58) and FNA (n = 58) groups (98.3 % [95 %CI 94.9 % - 100 %] vs. 94.8 % [95 %CI 91.9 % - 100 %]; P = 0.671). Compared with FNA, FNB required a significantly lower median number of needle passes to establish a diagnosis (1.0 vs. 2.0; P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis of 111 patients with malignant lesions, the proportion of patients in whom malignancy was diagnosed on the first pass was significantly greater in the FNB group (72.7 % vs. 37.5 %; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall accuracy of FNB and FNA in patients with solid pancreatic masses was comparable; however, fewer passes were required to establish the diagnosis of malignancy using FNB.This study was registered on the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000014057).
All Author(s)
Y. N. Lee ; J. H. Moon ; H. K. Kim ; H. J. Choi ; M. H. Choi ; D. C. Kim ; T. H. Lee ; S. W. Cha ; Y. D. Cho ; S. H. Park
Issued Date
2014
Type
Article
Keyword
AgedBiopsy, Large-Core Needle/*instrumentationEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/*instrumentationEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged*NeedlesPancreatic Neoplasms/*diagnosisProspective Studies
ISSN
0013-726x
Citation Title
Endoscopy
Citation Volume
46
Citation Number
12
Citation Start Page
1056
Citation End Page
1062
Language(ISO)
eng
DOI
10.1055/s-0034-1377558
URI
http://schca-ir.schmc.ac.kr/handle/2022.oak/2341
Appears in Collections:
소화기내과 > 1. Journal Papers
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.